Paul Morris <p...@paulwmorris.com> writes: > On Nov 2, 2012, at 4:45 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> Paul Morris <p...@paulwmorris.com> writes: >> >>> On Oct 31, 2012, at 7:11 PM, Paul Morris <p...@paulwmorris.com> wrote: >>> >>> That worked to avoid the error, but didn't seem quite right (since it >>> didn't seem to matter what values you fed it). So I checked the >>> LilyPond source code (scm/output-ps.scm), and it seems like this is >>> the better way to do it: >>> >>> upTriangle = >>> #(ly:make-stencil >>> '(path 0.09 >>> '(moveto -.1875 -.5 >> ^^^^ this quote seems spurious. > > Thanks David, I tried removing it, but I got the following error: > > In expression (moveto -0.1875 -0.5 ...) [...] Unbound variable: moveto
Well, I haven't looked usage up in the manual but will take your word for it as I don't know my way around the backend. Seems like some design decisions were involved with consequences I don't find intuitive, or something else is at play here. I'll certainly stand by my statement that the quote _seems_ spurious, even though that may not be your fault but that of the make-stencil design. Sorry for the confusion. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user