On Dec 17, 2012, at 6:13 PM, Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I had a closer look at this snippet. > Attached you'll find my version of it. Hi Harm, I had a chance to take a closer look at your improved version of this snippet. Very nice work, thank you! The changes and additions all make sense to me. It will be much harder to break it now. It's nice having the stemAdjust function to make that simpler, and I liked your crazy NoteHeads. :-) I started work on editing it for the LSR (see attachment). Having the comments explaining the steps is really nice. I thought it would probably be good to comment out the test section and the music examples that go with it to keep things focused and simple for people browsing the LSR. I do like keeping these tests in there since they will help people understand the code and the problems that it solves. What do you think? Also, I noticed a small fine-tuning issue. In the four note chords in the last measure of the attached LSR example, the two offset E flat notes are not exactly aligned with the A and C notes above them in either chord, if you zoom in. In the previous version they were fully aligned. I haven't had a chance to try and fix this yet. Any thoughts on what needs to be adjusted there? > BTW, 'stem-begin-position doesn't exist in 2.14.2, but overriding > 'stem-attachment will work, if it is placed correctly. Huh, that's odd, as overriding 'stem-begin-position is working in the current LSR version (2.14.2 - http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=861). Maybe you meant it doesn't exist in 2.16? Good to know that stem-attachment will work for chords. I'll just need to figure out the proper placement. Regards and thanks again, -Paul
offset-note-heads-04.ly
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user