Hi,
> I feel that the original proposal, as specified elsewhere, violates the
> principle of least surprise for existing users starting new projects (not
> using convert-ly) with the new LilyPond.
I'm not sure I understand why that's true… As I understand the proposal,
\relative { c''' d e f }
would come out as a rising step-wise scale, starting on c''' — which is not in
the least surprising to me.
Please explain how it's surprising, or how I am perhaps misunderstanding the
original proposal.
Thanks,
Kieren.
p.s. In the end, I'll almost certainly still stick with the
emminently-obvious/logical [to me]
\relative c''' { c d e f }
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
