Wim van Dommelen <m...@wimvd.nl> writes:

> Those "octave check" warnings are the only one you can sort of safely
> disregard, they put thing back on track.

Well, if they put things back on track, things have been off-track at
the point of warning.  What is safe about disregarding that?

-- 
David Kastrup


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to