Paul Morris <p...@paulwmorris.com> writes: > After getting that working I checked to see if anything changed > between v. 2.16 to 2.17.19 And I'm really glad to say that in 2.17.19 > the positioning of the rests was almost exactly what I wanted by > default! The only ones that needed re-positioning were the rarer ones > that were longer than a whole rest. Also the dots on about half of > the rests also still needed re-positioning.
Could you elaborate? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
