I've noticed for awhile that the mi shaped notehead is wider than the other
shaped noteheads. This creates some rather unattractive misalignments when
stacked with the "do" notehead, for instance:
\relative c' { \key c \major \aikenHeads <c e>1 <c e>2 <c e>4 }
I don't really know much about Metafont or compiling the fonts, but I was
looking through some of the mf source code and I noticed that all the other
solfa noteheads have code like this:
save do_weight;
do_weight := 2;
But for the mi notehead, this code appears:
save mi_weight, mi_width;
mi_weight := 2;
mi_width := 1.2;
Why is there a "mi_width" variable being used here when not in the other
shape definitions? In all the other examples of shaped notes I have, the
noteheads are the same width, regardless of shape, and the do and mi
noteheads touch points.
Cheers,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
