Please ask Mr. Aldridge about that ;-)
I assume it is the 'pattern number', not the binary number. So he probably
started with 1, not 0, although I don't see much use in the two first patterns
anyway.
Urs
Jim Long <[email protected]> schrieb:
>On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 04:03:25PM +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
>>
>> For each number in the range it should:
>> - produce a LilyPond pattern corresponding to the binary
>representation
>> of the given number
>
>It may be my misunderstanding, but is the number below the systems
>meant to indicate the number whose binary representation is being used?
>The PDF's musical examples show representations of 72-75, but the
>numbers at the bottom are 7.73-7.76.
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
