I will try later That's what a quick googling showed up for me too. Cheers, jp
Am 01.08.2013 um 15:40 schrieb David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: > Jan-Peter Voigt <jp.vo...@gmx.de> writes: > >> Hi Kieren, >> >> I did some checks on the absolute font-sizes: >> - If you do a stencil-add on a stencil created via >> grob-interpret-markup and interpret-markup inside a normal markup, >> they exactly match- >> - If you do a pixel by pixel compare (I did in gimp) a Lyric markup >> with an abs-font-size with different global-staff-sizes, they also >> match ... >> ... but you have to move the letter. IMO this is reasonable, because >> different staff-sizes mean different scaling of anything else but >> these absolute scaled fonts. >> Now if you import a simple PDF with a single 'X' 42pt into >> Libre/OpenOffice, it will show the found font-sizes of the >> text-objects. >> If you create the PDF with LibreOffice Century Schoolbook L 42pt and >> reimport that PDF, you will have exactly 42pt. >> If you create PDF files with an absolute-font-size of 42pt, it will >> result in 41,9pt in the reimported file - regardless of the >> global-staff-size. >> AFAICS the font-size is absolute, but there seems to be a calculation >> inaccuracy of 0.1pt. > > Does the patch in > <URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3483> help? > > -- > David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
