I agree. That's the main reason why I chose to write that comment on this mailing list vs. his blog post ;)
David Kastrup wrote > SoundsFromSound < > soundsfromsound@ > > writes: > >> I'm surprised that no one else in those comments responded to any of the >> LilyPond mentions. > > Frankly, if I were Daniel, I'd be pissed already. I think he is > perfectly correct to remind people that his blog is not the place for > LilyPond advocacy. Since it is also not the place to go into real depth > concerning what LilyPond is and what not, there is little point in > bringing it up in the first place. > > When he states things for which LilyPond provides a valid counterthesis > or counterexample, pointing out an example may be in order. > > But for statements like "I changed to LilyPond and never looked back" > and similar is simply wrong. > > He does have misconceptions about LilyPond, but his blog is not the > place to address them. Yes, that's unfortunate, but please behave like > one would expect guests to behave. We are not doing our case a favor by > making a spectacle where it is not asked for. > > -- > David Kastrup > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@ > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ----- composer | sound designer -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Steinberg-s-progress-report-on-new-notation-software-tp148842p148899.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
