As a fairly outside observer who is only an occasional user of Lilypond....
On 08/09/2013 11:43 PM, Carl Peterson wrote: > The concern I have on SMuFL is that it is an as-of-yet immature standard > without broad support outside of Steinberg. ... Will it be a futile > effort because the SMuFL standard dies from lack of interest/acceptance? A flip side of that question is: How much would adding Lilypond support for SMuFL help to *make* SMuFL into an accepted and common standard? I don't want to say "you guys should (not) support SMuFL", but I think that question is worth thinking about, even if you decide the answer is "probably not much." :-) Evan _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
