Hi, 2013/8/18 <u...@openlilylib.org>: > > Zitat von Janek Warchoł <janek.lilyp...@gmail.com>: >> We don't know if it would be worth it to make LilyPond support SMuFL. >> But i think the question is: what should we do to make it easier to us >> to adopt SMuFL if we decide to to do in the future? >> In other words, how can we influence SMuFL design so that it would fit >> LilyPond better (without doing anything ourselves). For example, it >> would probably be a good idea to ensure that SMuFL has places for all >> glyphs we have. > > > I think that's the least we should try to achieve. Otherwise we'd risk > getting left behind if SMuFL turns out to become an accepted standard. And > although we don't know that yet, I think chances are not too bad that this > may happen. > > One additional suggestion would be to move Emmentaler's glyphs to the > Unicode codepoints suggested by SMuFL. IIUC this wouldn't need any internal > change in the layout engine at first. And in the process of remapping any > gaps would become apparent 'automatically'. > I think there even is someone here who would be willing to look into it - if > he gets any positive feedback from the community.
I can help with this - i don't have time to get fully engaged, but if there will be a volunteer and he runs into trouble, i will do my best to help him. cheers Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user