On Sep 10, 2013, at 11:14 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Patrick or Cynthia Karl <pck...@mac.com> writes: > >>> From: Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> >>> To: Patrick or Cynthia Karl <pck...@mac.com> >> >>> [deleting billions of lines] >> >>> From: James Harkins < jamshar...@gmail.com> >>> Patrick or Cynthia Karl <pckarl <at> mac.com> writes: >> >>> Well, I don't have an answer to the question, but... a reminder... it is >>> VERY >>> uncool to quote an *entire digest* when you're replying to only one message. >> >> I am so sorry and will try to do much better. > > Maybe the reply-to header of the digest should not even point to the > list? Replying to a digest makes no sense with regard to message > threading
It would be logically consistent since the reply-to header is not set to the list for non-digest subscribers, but what would be the alternative? no-reply-lilyp...@gnu.org? _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
