----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Morley" <thomasmorle...@gmail.com>
>
> I agree, although I don't expect Guile problems for anything but plain
> ASCII
> prime and double prime, but I might be wrong.
> It's easy to tweak for people who want to use it, anyway; those were
> just
> the glyphs for which I assume that everybody agrees they should be in
> there.
> YMMV, though.
Well, I could add a comment about how to extend the 'space-set' with
other characters.
Additionally it might be a thought to tag it docs.
@Phil: What do you think?
Cheers,
Harm
Not sure what you're asking my opinion about. If it's a question of how
much to modify a snippet - entirely up to you, but I generally restrict
myself to formatting and where the style is obviously wrong. The OP can
always email updated versions to -devel and one of us can update it.
As to whether to tag is as docs? If we do that, it will automatically
appear in the Snippets documentation
(http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/snippets/index.html). It will
become available for documentation authors to add to other documents. So
the judgement call is simply - do I think this is of sufficient use to be
part of the LilyPond documentation set. If so, tag it.
--
Phil Holmes
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
