"Peter Gentry" <peter.gen...@sunscales.co.uk> writes: >>> I was confused by small parts of the manuals (I guess one is for >>> Windows and one for Unix, but that took a while to sink in) > >> No, either spelling of the option will work under either system. > > PG: Oh but why is the second more complex? Does it include greater > scope for specification?
It's easier to remember than a single-letter option once you have too many of the latter. I think one rather hard UNIX quiz question is to name the three letters which _aren't_ single letter options of the ls command. >> Cheer up > > DK: Really. > > PG: Yes, why not....:) It is more gracious to achieve a positive reaction by suitable content rather than commands. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
