2013/10/18 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>:
> Janek Warchoł <janek.lilyp...@gmail.com> writes:
>> That's nice! Could you make it work with 2.17.3 (we had to freeze
>> LilyPond version to ensure that no regressions in the scores appear,
>> and so we're using 2.17.3 for almost all scores)?
>
> No. It's not just a matter of replacing "(" with parenthesisOpenSymbol.
> Previous to 2.17.25, the parser had quite hardwired expectations and
> won't take well at all to seeing an event-function instead of an event
> here. And looking at the old parser code, it does not even go through
> any hook you could reasonably hijack. Either you modify the C++ code of
> the parser for your counting or you are out of luck.
Ok, i understand that this is not a simple fix (contrary to what i expected).
BTW, this is a good opportunity to say: thank you again for making
LilyPond easier to work with!
> But "regressions in the score" should not really be an issue if you are
> just counting slurs once in a while. It's not like you need perfect
> output from the same run of LilyPond.
you're right, i'll try this way.
best,
Janek
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
