Hi Francisco, I am well aware of everything you wrote about, and my suggestion would be to rename it to "2.17 since 2.16" as you say, and then change it back to "2.18 since 2.16" when that version is released. I just find it might confuse people if they come across a page talking about a version of a software that still does not exist (and particularly when this page in question is under the 2.17 documentation, as you rightly pointed out).
Take care, Gilberto On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Francisco Vila <paconet....@gmail.com>wrote: > 2013/10/18 Gilberto Agostinho <gilbertohasn...@gmail.com>: > > Hi all, > > > > I came across the following page of LilyPond's documentation now ( > > http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/changes-big-page.html ) > and > > its title reads "New features in 2.18 since 2.16". I think it was > probably > > meant to be "2.17" instead of "2.18", am I right? Unless someone > released a > > version 2.18 and is keeping it secret from me :) > > 2.17 is unstable and will become eventually the next stable release. > Right? The changes page is intended to tell what changes 2.18 has > since 2.16 and it is not finished until 2.18 is a reality. I agree in > that, given 2.18 does not exist, the page actually shows changes of > 2.17, but you will also agree in that 2.17 is not recommended for > general adoption, instead of hiding the page until 2.18 comes out, we > show it and leave it prepared to serve as an actual 2.18 page. > > Or, we could name it "2.17 since 2.16" to be clearer, and change this > to 2.18 on its release. That would indeed be clearer because the page > is under lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/ . > > -- > Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) > www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com >
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
