On Oct 28, 2013, at 11:51 PM, Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote:
> I haven't tried to rewrite your code, but when I first learned Scheme I > was told that anytime you saw lots of set! expressions in the code, you > were trying to write procedural code (I.e. c) instead of functional code > (Scheme). Your code seems to have lots of set! expressions; it may be > possible to rewrite it in a more functional manner. Hi Carl, Thanks again for this tip. Attached is a revision that's much more functional in coding style, at least as far as I understand the distinction after reading up on it a bit. (Not a single "set!" to be found.) Style considerations aside, I think this revision is also just generally better overall. -Paul
make-path-stencil-function-rev2.ly
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
