Paul Morris <p...@paulwmorris.com> writes: > Ideally the way to handle this *very* *very* marginal issue, would be > to have the default settings for middleCPosition and clefPosition for > each kind of clef, loaded at the staff level for each staff (as staff > context properties?) where the user could override them for any given > staff and clef. > > And... I think the phrase for that is "patches welcome" ?
Unlikely. That sounds like a whole awful mess without any apparent advantage. If you want a differently located clef, define it with another name rather than have particular staves messing with clef positions. "Patches welcome" is more for stuff that appears useful but is not currently a goal for anybody. Stuff that is likely to get accepted/appreciated when a patch is actually presented. So far I have seen nothing suggesting that this would be the case here. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
