2013/11/11 Gilberto Agostinho <gilbertohasn...@gmail.com>: > I agree that she would not approve a solution that confuses with clef > transposition, but above the clef of the top stave is not what LilyPond is > doing, is it? > > Look at the solution that the Sibelius software uses: > > <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n153706/sibelius.png>
Do you realize that saying "sibelius is doing x" will make many LilyPond devs think "let's make sure LilyPond doesn't do x, because sibelius cannot possibly be right!"? ;-) > IMO, there is no confusion between what is a bar number and what is a > transposition. And its solution respects what 99% of all other scores and > engravers do (at least, I could still not find a single example of > LilyPond's style of bar numbering anywhere else). Indeed, when done properly this style of numbering shouldn't be confused with clef transposition. However, i agree with what David said in the other thread about LilyPond's barnumber positions being easier to see; as i don't think that Lilypond's way of placing barnumbers is wrong (i.e. it doesn't make scores difficult to read) i would keep it that way even if everyone else do it differently. Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user