On 14/11/13 15:05, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote:
there is an update of this snippet in the mail archives and I will post my version later.
Fantastic, thank you! :-)
You're right, but I would take this as a proposal to add this as a standard command to lily.
Yes, I agree. In fact for optimal usability, I think it should be an on-by-default feature, as the most likely use-case for voices sharing a staff is for the rests to be combined where possible.
One can always compare, who does it best. But IMO the metric of doing it good,better,best is not a one-dimensional one.
Oh, sure. It's just that I get uncomfortable whenever I see people respond to news of a good feature in another piece of software with remarks along the lines of, "Hey, but we do [other feature] better" or "Hey, you can already do that by [complicated method that's much harder than the other software]".
I think that it's always very important to try and understand why people see value in other software, and what things it provides that one's own tools don't.
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
