pls <p.l.schm...@gmx.de> writes: > On 20.11.2013, at 12:25, Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org> wrote: > >> a chord is repeated an octave higher, which is indicated by an \ottava. >> Does the repeated chord need accidentals or not? >> >> Are there rules for this? Do you have any opinions?
> Gould's gut feeling says you should "repeat an accidental if sounding > at a different octave, even when the same pitch is used with an octave > sign". Huh. That appeals more to my mathematician's gut than my musician's. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
