2013/11/24 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: > Janek Warchoł <janek.lilyp...@gmail.com> writes: > >> This is mentioned in >> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/modifying-shapes >> - is that example not clear enough? How should we improve it? > > Maybe an interface that's easier to remember? > > \beforeBreak \shape ... > \afterBreak \shape ... > \shape ... ( > > with the ability to leave off any specification and/or use any order of > \shape commands. Yes, that's clearly not 2.18 material. But probably > worth thinking about.
Interesting idea, but what about slurs that are broken multiple times? On the other hand, such situation is quite rare... 2013/11/24 "Dr. med. Kai Lautenschläger" <dr.lautenschlae...@gmx.net>: > Dear Janek, > > thanks a lot. Works just perfect! > > I can not find anything about using two sets of offsets in the link you > provided. And I probably wouldn’t have found it, since it doesn’t mention the > \shape-command. Maybe pointing at \shape would be helpful, especially since > it seems to me, that the „known problem“ can be worked around partly with > \shape. > > … I take that back!!! I originally read the german translation and the above > is my replay for that (I was automatically referred there?!?!). The english > version has it all. Thanks a lot. Ah, ok. That explains :) best, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
