Richard Shann <rich...@rshann.plus.com> writes: > On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 09:52 +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > >> Denemo: this is a GUI application for writing music scores that uses >> LilyPond internally for creating its output. While working with it, >> you will not be exposed to the LilyPond language at all, > > This is incorrect. If you double click on a note, repeat bar ... you > are told the LilyPond syntax that this element has created. If you > switch to the LilyPond view of the Denemo score you see the LilyPond > syntax and can edit it. There are some limitations still in that > editing (e.g. changing a note to a different note is still not > possible, and there is no syntax highlighting, but you can re-write > entirely the score layout starting from the default).
Ok ok, I guess I'll get the Midi-equipped accordion from the storage, see whether any contacts are stuck, install a current version of Denemo and get myself informed. >> and the LilyPond documentation will be mostly irrelevant. > > I think this is not so either: it is slightly daft that you need to > run the insert LilyPond command in the main Denemo display rather than > in the LilyPond view in order to start inserting text, but the > LilyPond syntax is entirely relevant if you want to do things that > Denemo does not have built in. Ok, so it is mostly irrelevant if you > just want to do things that Denemo has built in, but I am sure you > have written all that other LilyPond syntax for very good reasons :) How does Denemo's relation to LilyPond compare to LyX's with LaTeX? Anybody here who knows both? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
