David Kastrup wrote > TaoCG < > tao_lilyponduser@
> > writes: > >> David Kastrup wrote >>> >>> Again, it is totally unclear what you want to be your input and your >>> output. >> >> If my message reached you like this then indeed it is. >> On my side, via the nabble web interface, it looks fine though. > > Web interfaces are somewhat treacherous. Gmane.org seems to be more > reliable. > >> I'll just post a screenshot and try to make it clearer..... >> >> 2013-12-13_154458.png >> <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n155723/2013-12-13_154458.png> >> > > Well, an afterthought: you could probably define uppercase letters to be > a quartertone (or less) sharp, and then postprocess your music, turning > all of those back to normal pitch and adding the top octave. > > If you do the unsharpening/octavation in the toplevel-music-functions > hook, it will actually happen at a time when all \relative music has > already been turned into absolute music, so that would not interfere. > > -- > David Kastrup > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@ > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user That's an interesting idea, I'll definitely try it, thanks! What exactly do you mean by toplevel? Are these functions defined or applied differently than regular music functions? -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Custom-note-names-octavize-pitch-tp155705p155770.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
