On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org> wrote:
> <...SNIPSNAP...> >> notation is less complex for the player, but not being a pianist, i'm >> not sure if it would be considered the "correct" way to do it. if not, >> i'm open to suggestions on how better to notate this section. i haven't >> consulted gould on the matter yet, but will do so this evening. >> > > As a pianist I'd say this notation is perfectly clear. I'm even quite sure > that it's a very common notation for such distributed repetitions (but I > don't have my scores at home, so I can't check). But maybe looking at some > IMSLP scores of Liszt studies might be even better than looking up Gould ;-) that was a good tip -- turned up the amazing cross-staff beams attached... :D (i'll have to try this with lilypond...). I would say LilyPond should handle this automatically, so I'd vote for >> "bug". > > mark knoop just confirmed this has already been discussed on the -devel list. regards, sb -- Do not meddle in the affairs of trombonists, for they are subtle and quick to anger.
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
