On 31/12/13 11:13, David Kastrup wrote:
Noeck <noeck.marb...@gmx.de> writes:
Am 31.12.2013 00:35, schrieb Eluze:
Tom Cloyd-2 wrote
Running convert-ly (from Frescobaldi) on a score, I get this at the top
of the code:
\version "2.17.97"
I can confirm this using version 2.18.0 (both within Frescobaldi and on
the commandline). I also would have expected 2.18.0 after the conversion.
It's due to a miscommunication between myself and Phil. This is
harmless though a bit of a nuisance. Most of the time, you'll want to
use the -d option anyway to avoid declaring a larger version than
necessary: in that case this oversight will not have an effect.
If you want to really have the version display converted to 2.18.0, you
can use -t 2.18.0 I think.
No, with 2.18.0 convert-ly, using the -t 2.18.0 option still leaves the
version number in the file at 2.17.97 (Linux amd64).
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
