On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Noeck <noeck.marb...@gmx.de> wrote: > > [...] > > Hmm, yes for the tuplet5 yes. But not for the tuplet8 that I wanted to > use. So perhaps that’s just a bug in the font? >
I can confirm that it doesn't work for tuplet8; in addition, the SMuFL spec mysteriously skips over the gClefLigatedNumberAbove+tuplet8 ligature. Weird. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
