Marc Hohl <m...@hohlart.de> writes:
> Am 06.03.2014 18:00, schrieb David Kastrup:
>> David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes:
>>
> [...]
>>
>> So I'm now down to
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> and that's probably long enough I should spend on this distraction.
>
> What about
>
> << { r8 a' d e f\3 a\2 | <f\3 a\2 d\1>2\arpeggio } \\
> { d,2.~ | d2 } >> r4
>
> for the final bars? The position change from the first to the tenth
> fret remains the same but starts earlier and gives a nice line to
> the topmost note of the final arpeggiated chord.
>
> Ok, just a nitpick ...
Now that I was allowed to make a noise again, I checked that version.
The basic idea is good. However, the arpeggio becomes redundant: there
is no need to strike the notes again. If one did so, one better would
restrike the bass note as well, but I think it's better just keeping
them all on sustain without further notice.
Definitely an improvement. I'll just have to cast this into code.
Thanks
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
