Thank you to Phil and Thomas for a quick response! I think Phil's response
was "tongue-in-cheek", but I'm not sure! :-) At any rate the result looks
like my first example, so it wasn't an improvement. Thomas's suggestion
works great and I hope I've learned a little more about tweaking as a
result.
Can either of you suggest a good way to improve my knowledge of Scheme? (I
know almost nothing: almost everything I know about coding I've learned
through engraving music with LilyPond --- which I love.)
Thanks again, you guys are great! Someday I hope to join the bug squad
again!
Mark
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com>wrote:
> 2014-03-08 12:51 GMT+01:00 Mark Mathias <d8val...@gmail.com>:
> > This doesn't look right:
> >
> > \version "2.18.0"
> >
> > %Fingering collides with bracket.
> >
> > \relative {
> >
> > \[ b4^2 c^3 \]
> >
> > }
> [...]
> > Would someone please help me position the fingering withing the bracket,
> > either by lengthening the bracket or horizontally moving the fingering to
> > the right?
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> try:
>
> \version "2.18.0"
>
> \relative {
> \once \override LigatureBracket.shorten-pair = #'(-1.4 . -0.2)
> \[ b4^2 c^3 \]
> \[ b4-\tweak #'X-offset #1.5 ^2 c^3 \]
> }
>
>
> HTH,
> Harm
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
