- Von meinem Fliewatüüt gesendet.
> On 17 Mar 2014, at 11:57, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > > Robert Schmaus <robert.schm...@web.de> writes: > >> So, again, it boils down to whatever works. There's no standard to >> this, and frankly, I've never experienced that as a problem. Jazz >> music is improvised music, and I don't know a jazz musician who has >> problems "improvising" here as well. Everyone has different >> preferences, sure, but problems reading different styles - not at all. >> My own preference for C-Δ7 over, say, Cmmaj7 is simply a question of >> space: the latter takes up WAY too much of it (in particular as this >> chord often appears as a transition between C- and C-7 and uses only >> half a bar). >> >> But there's another thing that surprises me in this discussion: I >> always thought that Lilypond is mainly being used and intended for >> "classical" (exact) music. >> Now I have the impression that indeed many use it for jazz sheets as >> we'll - I, myself, use LP only for that, but can't move from version >> 2.16 to 17 or 18, because the possibility to have Staffs accept chord >> names has been removed. > > Please don't spread rumors. It works as before: > > <URL:http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/context-layout-order> > > This has been fixed in 2.17.30, issue 3641. So it most definitely does > not preclude you from moving to 2.18 or 2.19. > >> That is, however a common notation practice in jazz music. Is there an >> obvious replacement for this that I haven't seen yet ... or is no one >> but me using that notation style in LP? > > N/A > > -- > David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user