On 20/03/2014 10:30, Urs Liska wrote:
I think that LilyPond's main strength is transformative use: different
page formats, different media, different transpositions, individual
variations.
Yes, and I have/had the impression that it _is_ possible now to
promote this feature. Of course I don't expect the final outcome to
match my current enthusiasm, but I'll surely keep you informed about
my progress.
Given my experience of buying some pieces, this is actually an extremely
useful use.
Okay, my experience is old, but I bought some pieces by P.D.Q.Bach. For
a small score (ten pages?) the number of transcription errors between
the score and parts was amazing. Iirc the score was correct, but the
parts had errors galore.
Cheers,
Wol
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
