James:
Thank you for the link. I will study it and let you know.
Emmanuel,
Ming
On Sunday, June 1, 2014 6:54:47 AM, James <pkx1...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 01/06/14 11:34, MING TSANG wrote:
lilyponders:
>I am transcribe a score hardcopy and I encounter lily does not generate as the
>score hardcopy.
>questions:
>(1) are they the same?
>(2) how can I make it show as the score hardcopy?
>(3) Is there a sample chord name sample?
>
>
>Below is a sample code:
>\version "2.19.7"
>\language "english"
>chordz = \chordmode {
>bf2:2 % score hardcopy show Bf2 : lily code as bf2:2 ->generate as Bfsus2
>?are they the same?
>f2:sus % score hardcopy show Fsus : lily code as f2:sus ->generate as F
>?are they the same?
>f2 % score hardcopy show F2 : lily code as f2 ->generate as F ?are
>they the same?
>ef:min7 % score hardcopy show EfM7 : lily code as ef:min7 ->generate as Efm7
>?are they the same?
>}
>\score {
>
><<
>\new ChordNames \chordz
>
>\new Staff { \chordz }
>>>
>
>\layout { }
>}
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Ming,
I cannot answer the specific comparative examples, but the Appendix
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation-big-page#common-chord-modifiers
does show much more than it ever did in the 2.18 docs.
Does this new information here help or not?
James _______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
