Janek Warchoł <janek.lilyp...@gmail.com> writes: > 2014-07-08 13:39 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de>: >> The 2.18 changes document says that #'(Staff Accidental) and >> Staff.Accidental were now interchangeable, however if I replace it in the >> second function call, I get errors (unexpected "." etc.). Is there a way to >> avoid this in the coding of the function or should it be considered a bug? > > > I think that symbol-list-or-symbol? is what you need:
I'd probably use symbol-list? here. symbol-list-or-symbol? is a bit of a compatibility crutch for functions that previously accepted #'xxx syntax for their arguments, possibly mimicking \override syntax. For newly introduced functions, accepting #'xxx in addition to #'(xxx) does not seem like a necessity. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
