> A non-techie might have problems knowing the difference between # and ♯, and > between b and ♭ > And what about the double-sharp? What symbol would be used for that? > > I agree it is easier to read. But you normally don't use LilyPond just to > read music. But if you do, you are definitely not a non-techie :-) > > IMO opinion using these unicode symbols for sharps and flats is an > interesting idea - but I personally will probably never use it. >
I agree, it's likely to remain a niche option. I don't see that as a reason for not including it though, and as for double-sharps, is "c♯♯" more problematic than "cciscis"? _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
