Am 20.11.2014 17:27, schrieb tisimst:
Urs,
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Urs Liska [via Lilypond] <[hidden
email] </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=168847&i=0>> wrote:
Am 20.11.2014 15:24, schrieb tisimst:
I'm afraid I don't entirely understand your question...
1)
Did you produce the condensed set?
Yes.
2)
If so, did you design the glyph shapes individually or through
applying some sort of automatic scaling?
Automatic scaling. I realize this may be heresy, but it works, doesn't it?
I don't want to discuss if it's heresy, but it's noticeable.
I didn't test it on a score yet, only on a document with continuous text
(where it may not be so appropriate in the first place), and the result
*is* quite noticeable.
However, I'll have to test it as LilyPond lyrics, and maybe in a
document with narrow columns where you'd expect a condensed font.
Thanks anyway
Urs
I think that's clearer, isnt it?
Urs
Yes, thanks for clarifying :)
Regards,
Abraham
------------------------------------------------------------------------
View this message in context: Re: Text fonts
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Text-fonts-tp168738p168847.html>
Sent from the User mailing list archive
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html> at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
