On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 16:35 -0800, Matthew James Briggs wrote: > > I'm starting to wonder if I should just skip it and learn Lilypond > instead, thus my object-oriented world could output Lilypond code > instead of MusicXML.
I think that would be very wise: IMHO MusicXML gives the impression of something well-designed and comprehensively thought-out whereas the reality is that it is a horrendous hotchpotch of constructs singularly unsuited to describing written notation. With its horrible going forwards and backwards in time semantics, I doubt if it is suited to describing music events either. Richard Shann _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
