Greetings David, Is the command \markLengthOn possibly what you are looking for?
Hwaen Ch'uqi On 1/14/15, David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk> wrote: > On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 23:17 +0100, Thomas Morley wrote: >> 2015-01-12 22:37 GMT+01:00 David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk>: >> > The default position of tempo indications is, to my eye, rather too >> > close to whatever is beneath them, be it a stave, a note or a slur. >> > >> > I have tried experimenting with >> > >> > \override TextScript #'padding = #4 >> > >> > and >> > >> > \override TextScript.padding = #4 >> > >> > (I was unsure of the syntax) just to see if I can get my tempo markings >> > to move, but neither of these works. >> > >> > How can I get tempo markings to be placed higher? >> > >> > Also, occasionally I have two such markings quite close together >> > horizontally. How can I get them both to be placed at the same level, >> > even if this means that one of them has more than my default level of >> > space beneath it? >> > >> > David >> >> >> >> Hi David, >> >> please provide a minimal example, including a version-statement. >> >> Cheers, >> Harm > > Dominic pointed out that I should have used"MetronomeMark", not > "TextScript", so I have corrected this. > > \version "2.18.0" > > topLine = { > \relative c'' { > \tempo "Tempo 1" c2 c | > \tempo "Tempo 2" c'4( g c,2) | > \tempo "Tempo 3" f8 c g c, c'2 | > } > } > > bottomLine = { > \relative c'' { > \tempo "Tempo 1" c1 | > \tempo "Tempo 2" c1 | > \tempo "Tempo 3" c1 | > } > } > > \score { > \new StaffGroup << > \override Score.MetronomeMark.padding = #2 > \topLine > \bottomLine > >> > } > > In the above, "Tempo 1" appears where I want it, but "Tempo 2" and > "Tempo 3" are respectively too close to the slur and the beam. > > Also, sometimes I have 2 successive markings which come close together > but which nevertheless have to be anchored to different points in the > music. It would be useful to have these appearing at the same height as > each other, even though the clearance beneath one of them might be more > than it would need if it appeared on it's own. Is there any way of > achieving this, other than tweaking each individual case in each > individual part? > > David > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user