On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Schneidy [via Lilypond]
<ml-node+s1069038n17050...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> Hi Harm,
>
> 2015-01-15 3:22 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley <[hidden email]>:
>
>> foo =
>> #(define-music-function (parser location mus)(ly:music?)
>> (music-map
>> (lambda (m)
>> (if (music-is-of-type? m 'arpeggio-event)
>> (make-music
>> 'ArpeggioEvent
>> 'tweaks
>> (list
>> (cons 'arpeggio-direction
>> (ly:music-property m 'direction))))
>> m))
>> mus))
>>
>>
>> \foo
>> \relative c'' {
>> \mark "sort of post-processing"
>> <g b d g>4\arpeggio
>> <g b d g>4^\arpeggio
>> <g b d g>4_\arpeggio
>> }
>
> I like this one.
> Cheers,
> Pierre
+1!
However, I'd rather not have to use another function (\foo) to do this.
Otherwise, I don't think there's any benefit over what is currently
required with \arpeggioArrowUp. Can't it be put directly into a command
that supports the direction indicators? I can't seem to find in the
documentation where the post-fix syntax is described.
-Abraham
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/arpeggioArrowUp-tp170464p170519.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
