2015-01-27 23:07 GMT+01:00 James Lowe <p...@gnu.org>: > On 27/01/15 18:25, Ali Cuota wrote: >> Here it is. > > Hardly a 'tiny' example > > http://lilypond.org/tiny-examples.html > > Can you at least get rid of the cruft that isn't anything to do with the > problem? I.e. a single file would help to determine if the problem is to > do with the 'include' function or not. > > Are all those lyric override settings necessary to show the problem, is > the ragged-last setting needed? ditto system count and all those context > overrides etc etc etc). > > The point is that the more complex your example the less likely that it > will even be looked at let alone acknowledged as a bug. > > James
James, is right. Remove all the stuff not needed to show the problem. A really tiny example would mean, that the problem would disappear, if you'd remove any further sign. Nevertheless I had a look into it. I didn't compile it. Because too much work on a non-tiny example ;) Though from reading the code: The "normal" file has 4. as last duration. LilyPond remembers this and will start the next musical-expression with this duration (the gregorian one), unless it's specified different. So you should specify the duration of the first note of the gregorian code and be done. Cheers, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
