> > > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +late_initcall(imx_cpuidle_init); > > We have a late_initcall here which needs to be protected from other > cpus. On the other hand we depend on board code calling > imx_cpuidle_board_params() before this initcall. I think the board code > should call a imx_cpuidle_init(struct imx_cpuidle_params > *cpuidle_params) instead which makes the flow of execution more clear. > > imx_cpuidle_init can not be called directly in board code, since it is too early to register cpuidle driver and device which depend on some other system resource.
Yong
_______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
