On Thu, Feb 24, 2011, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > One of the issues here I guess is: do we know what all the data required > is? My impression (from a step removed, admittedly) is that adding > support for new boards to l-m-c still tends to require code changes and > not just data changes. Hopefully this will stabilize over time though.
That's fair; I don't think we can be future proof to whatever the world is going to come up with, but we can try to be good at adapting to the type of changes which we've seen so far ;-) If we end up doing 90% of the changes in the data and 10% in the code, I still call that a win over doing 100% of the changes in the code+data piece! -- Loïc Minier _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
