On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 14:47 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Saturday, February 26, 2011 14:38:50 Felipe Contreras wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Laurent Pinchart > > <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com> wrote: > > >> > Perhaps GStreamer experts would like to comment on the future plans > > >> > ahead > > >> > for zero copying/IPC and low power HW use cases? Could Gstreamer adapt > > >> > some ideas from OMX IL making OMX IL obsolete? > > >> > > >> perhaps OMX should adapt some of the ideas from GStreamer ;-) > > > > > > I'd very much like to see GStreamer (or something else, maybe lower > > > level, but > > > community-maintainted) replace OMX. > > > > Yes, it would be great to have something that wraps all the hardware > > acceleration and could have support for software codecs too, all in a > > standard interface. It would also be great if this interface would be > > used in the upper layers like GStreamer, VLC, etc. Kind of what OMX > > was supposed to be, but open [1]. > > > > Oh wait, I'm describing FFmpeg :) (supports vl42, VA-API, VDPAU, > > DirectX, and soon OMAP3 DSP) > > > > Cheers. > > > > [1] > > http://freedesktop.org/wiki/GstOpenMAX?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=gst-openmax.png > > > > > > Are there any gstreamer/linaro/etc core developers attending the ELC in San > Francisco > in April? I think it might be useful to get together before, during or after > the > conference and see if we can turn this discussion in something more concrete. > > It seems to me that there is an overall agreement of what should be done, but > that we are far from anything concrete. >
I will be there and this was definitely a topic I intended to talk about. See you there. Edward > Regards, > > Hans > _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev