On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 09:38 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 March 2011 03:32:35 John Stultz wrote:
> > Thoughts and feedback (or alternate approaches) would be appreciated.
> > 
> > thanks
> > -john
> > 
> > CC: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@secretlab.ca>
> > CC: Jason Hui <jason....@linaro.org>
> > CC: patc...@linaro.org
> > Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stu...@linaro.org>
> 
> The patch looks fine to me (as far as my little Kconfig
> knowledge goes). Two comments about the submission form though:
> 
> * Ideally, the initial description is split into two parts: one
> that is suitable as a changelog and the other that is your
> personal comment, including the "thanks" part, and put it below
> the --- line, so that git can automatically cut it.

Yea, although early on I tend to be a little more informal, I do usually
clean up the commit log before actually submitting anything more then
RFC level code.


> * I think you should also Cc the Kconfig maintainer, Roman
> Zippel <zip...@linux-m68k.org>, and linux-kbu...@vger.kernel.org.

This patch was actually submitted to both a few weeks ago. In this case,
as I'm trying to RFC the overview of what I'm trying to accomplish
specifically on the linaro list, I trimmed the cc list. Once I sort out
the Linaro distro policy bits, and can drop the last quarter of the
patch set, I'll likely resubmit the entirety to the kbuild list (and
Roman, although he seems to be MIA these days).

thanks for the feedback!
-john



_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Reply via email to