On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Jonathan Corbet <cor...@lwn.net> wrote: > On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 09:13:59 +0100 > Hans Verkuil <hverk...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > >> All these memory-related modules have the same purpose: make it possible to >> allocate/reserve large amounts of memory and share it between different >> subsystems (primarily framebuffer, GPU and V4L). >> >> It really shouldn't be that hard to get everyone involved together and settle >> on a single solution (either based on an existing proposal or create a 'the >> best of' vendor-neutral solution). > > There is a memory management summit at the LF Collaboration Summit next > month. Perhaps this would be a good topic to raise there? I've added > Hugh to the Cc list in case he has any thoughts on the matter - and > besides, he doesn't have enough to do...:)
It's a good suggestion, Jon, thank you. But I don't see that any of the prime movers in this area have applied to come to LSF/MM this year: except for Kamezawa-san, who is coming (but I expect will be focussing on other issues). And now we're full up. Let me keep it in mind when drawing up the agenda; but I doubt this will be the forum to get such a ball rolling this year. Hugh _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
