Hi Arnd, Alexander, Some of the work arounds are just make shift solutions so that those dependent on the build can carry on with their work. Meanwhile as you guys said, the underlying problem needs to be addressed and fixed. This might take a while.
Regards Sachin On 16 March 2011 17:17, Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote: > On Wednesday 16 March 2011, Sachin Kamat wrote: > > --- a/elfcopy.c > > +++ b/elfcopy.c > > @@ -2456,7 +2456,6 @@ update_symbol_values(Elf *elf, GElf_Ehdr *ehdr, > > out why and also figure out whether the zero > value should have > > been adjusted, after all. > > */ > > - ASSERT(!(shdr_info[sym->st_shndx].shdr.sh_flags > & SHF_ALLOC)); > > ASSERT(shdr_info[i].shdr.sh_type == SHT_SYMTAB); > > } > > Like the -Werror changes that Alexander commented on, this change > circumvents the error output, but does not address the underlying > problem. If you remove an assertion, that at least needs a very > good explanation why the assertion was incorrect in the first > place. > > Arnd > -- With warm regards, Sachin
_______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
