Thanks for the links Zach. On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Zach Pfeffer <pfeff...@gmail.com> wrote: > John, > > I pulled the tree from: > > source: git://gitorious.org/pandaboard/u-boot.git > branch: origin/omap4_panda_es2.0 > board config: omap4430panda_config > > (referenced http://omappedia.org/wiki/OMAP_Pandroid_Main#Getting_Started) > > -Zach > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Alexander Sack <a...@linaro.org> wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Zach Pfeffer <pfeff...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Alexander Sack <a...@linaro.org> wrote: >>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Zach Pfeffer <pfeff...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Jim Huang <jim.hu...@linaro.org> wrote: >>>>>> On 18 April 2011 14:40, <patrik....@linaro.org> wrote: >>>>>>> From: Patrik Ryd <patrik....@linaro.org> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In the Linaro set up u-boot will look for uImage (and not for kernel). >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> tasks/kernel.mk | 4 ++-- >>>>>>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> hi Patrik, >>>>>> >>>>>> Does this imply that we requires u-boot as necessary support for common >>>>>> LEB? >>>>>> >>>>>> I am not sure if we should introduce an abstract provider for kernel >>>>>> image, but I prefer to specify in board configurations since we might >>>>>> migrate to other 'fastboot' compatible boot loader implementations >>>>>> such as lk (little kernel) used in Qualcomm patform. >>>>> >>>>> I haven't gotten into lk too much (used it and the legacy fastboot), >>>>> but it seems that sticking with u-boot may be a better approach since >>>>> it has wider community support and better cross-platform support. Was >>>>> there a specific reason to move to lk? >>>> >>>> I am happy to have a discussion about our default android bootloader >>>> at LDS in budapest. >>>> >>>> IIRC, one blueprint that John Rigby wanted to own is about adding >>>> fastboot support to u-boot ... maybe thats a good compromise instead >>>> of lk? >>> >>> That would be very nice. There's actually some documentation in u-boot >>> about fastboot (a README). I wonder if there's some support already? >> >> Yes, I was told that someone (TI?) had a public tree with it. If all >> goes well, John (CCed) would review those, clean the patches up, >> upstream and integrate then into our u-boot branches so we can have >> them for our LEB builds as well. >> >> -- >> >> - Alexander >> >
_______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
