On Wed, 11 May 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:44:49PM +0200, Grant Likely wrote: > > Right now it merges cleanly with linux-next and the resulting tree > > builds and boots at least on qemu. Unless you really object, I'm > > going to ask Stephen to add the following branch to the /end/ of the > > list of trees for linux-next so it can easily be dropped it if it > > causes any problems. > > As far as the set of five patches looks fine to me, I don't have any > objections against them. So I think we can merge them for .40. > > What I've always worried about is the platform stuff, and that's > something I'm going to continue worrying about because I don't think > we have sufficient review capacity to ensure that we don't end up > with lots of stupidities.
DT is certainly not a silver bullet. Good judgement will be needed as to what is put in DT and how it is represented. I don't think that it would make things worse than they are now though. I also do have some concerns about some aspects of DT which I've expressed several times in the past. However I don't think holding back those patches any longer is a solution though. So consider this as a ACK from my part to merge those patches now. This will get the ball rolling. Nicolas _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev