On 06/16/2011 11:54 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote: > On 16 June 2011 21:40, Stephen Boyd <sb...@codeaurora.org> wrote: >> The ARM ARM says these fields are IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED meaning that >> different vendors may attribute different meaning to these fields if >> they wish. Does that mean this should be a platform_*() function? >> > The ARM ARM also provides a recommended use of the fields of this > register and the TRM of each Cortex adds some details. On the cortex > A9, each platform can only set the value of the Cluster ID with the > CLUSTERID pins. I have tried to consolidate the value of MPIDR across > several platforms and they all match with the description. > > Have you got an example of a MPIDR register which doesn't match with > the implementation ?
Not that I know of. I'm more concerned with how the ARM ARM has two recommended usages for these fields depending on virtualization or not. I suppose we can handle that issue when it arises (or does your implementation already handle that?) -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev