On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Fathi Boudra <fathi.bou...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 23 June 2011 10:06, Alexander Sack <a...@linaro.org> wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:16 PM, James Westby <james.wes...@linaro.org> >> wrote: >>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:04:41 +0000, Fathi Boudra <fathi.bou...@linaro.org> >>> wrote: >>>> > If not, what are the blockers to doing so? >>>> >>>> Today, the builders are unstable. >>> >>> They have just had new hard disk enclosures added, and should be more >>> stable now. Let's monitor for a few days and see if they are more >>> stable. On what day should we re-assess the situation and make another >>> go/no-go call? >> >> can we somehow smoke test the infrastructure continuously till >> tomorrow and then reassess tomorrow afternoon? > > we can stress the system by increasing the build cadence (temporary > modify the daily build cron to trigger a build every 3h). >
couldn't we inject a big amount of test builds in the queue to achieve full utilization for 24 or 48 hours or so? of course, queuing them as low priority so they don't make our "real" builds the cycles. Lets see what james says ;). -- - Alexander _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
