On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 07:58:54PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Whenever we invent some new device tree binding support, we need to
> Cc [email protected] (Cc-ed).
Thanks for your reminder.
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 07:16:36PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi | 2 ++
> > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi
> > index 263e8f3..9e9943b 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi
> > @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
> > compatible = "arm,cortex-a9";
> > reg = <0>;
> > next-level-cache = <&L2>;
> > + cpu_freqs = <996000000 792000000 396000000 198000000>;
> > + cpu_volts = <1225000 1100000 950000 850000>;
>
> For dt property name, we use '-' rather than '_'.
ok.
>
> And I'm not sure this is correct, since these data obviously does not
> belong to "arm,cortex-a9".
That's why RFC.
Thanks
Richard
>
> Regards,
> Shawn
>
> > };
> >
> > cpu@1 {
> > --
> > 1.7.5.4
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
